Beyond Death: Understanding Attachment-Based Loss and the Search for Meaning in Life’s Inevitable Changes

Kevin Brough, MAMFT

When we think of grief, our minds naturally turn to the profound sorrow that follows the death of a loved one. Yet in my years of clinical practice, I’ve witnessed a more profound truth: we grieve far more than we realize. The young professional who relocates for a dream job grieves the community they’re leaving behind. The parent whose child leaves for college grieves not just their physical absence but the loss of their role as daily caregiver. The individual who abandons a long-held belief system grieves the certainty that once anchored their worldview. Each of these experiences, while distinct from death, shares a common thread—they all involve the disruption of attachment bonds that give our lives structure, meaning, and security.

Perhaps you’ve noticed this yourself: a persistent feeling that something is about to go wrong, a heaviness that follows you through ordinary days, or a sense of waiting for ‘the other shoe to drop.’ These feelings often signal unacknowledged grief—not necessarily for what has been lost, but for what is changing, what we fear losing, or what we expected our lives to be. This is the grief that doesn’t always have a name, the mourning that society doesn’t always recognize, yet it shapes our emotional landscape just as powerfully as any diagnosed loss.

The Foundation: Bowlby’s Attachment-Based Understanding of Loss

John Bowlby, the pioneering British psychologist and psychiatrist, fundamentally transformed our understanding of grief through his attachment theory (Bowlby, 1969, 1973, 1980). His revolutionary insight was deceptively simple yet profoundly important: human beings are biologically wired to form deep emotional bonds with others, and when these bonds are threatened or severed, we experience grief as an adaptive, evolutionarily programmed response. Bowlby observed that grief wasn’t a sign of psychological weakness or pathology, but rather a natural consequence of our fundamental need for connection (Bowlby, 1980).

What makes Bowlby’s framework so powerful is its recognition that attachment isn’t limited to romantic relationships or parent-child bonds. We form attachments to anyone or anything that provides us with a sense of security, comfort, and meaning (Ainsworth, 1989; Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). Consider, for a moment, the elderly woman who has lived in the same neighborhood for fifty years. Her attachment isn’t merely to a physical location—it’s to the familiar faces at the corner store, the sound of children playing in the park, the rhythm of seasons marking time through changing leaves on particular trees. When circumstances force her to move, she grieves not just a house but an entire ecosystem of attachments that anchored her sense of self and place in the world.

Through his clinical work with bereaved individuals and separated children, Bowlby identified four overlapping phases of mourning: numbing, yearning and searching, disorganization and despair, and reorganization (Bowlby, 1980). While he emphasized these weren’t rigid stages, they provided a framework for understanding how we process profound loss. Initially, we may feel shocked or emotionally numb—our psyche’s way of protecting us from overwhelming pain. This gives way to intense longing and, often, anger at the unfairness of our loss. As reality sets in, we may experience a period of disorganization where nothing feels quite right, where we struggle to find our footing in a world that has fundamentally changed. Finally, gradually and often imperceptibly, we begin to reorganize our lives around the loss, finding new patterns and possibilities while maintaining an internal connection to what was.

The Broader Lens: Recognizing the Full Spectrum of Attachment-Based Loss

When we expand Bowlby’s framework beyond death and separation, we discover that life is, in many ways, a continuous process of attachment and loss. M. Scott Peck, in his groundbreaking work

The Road Less Traveled, articulated this reality with characteristic directness: ‘Life is difficult’ (Peck, 1978, p. 15). But Peck didn’t stop at acknowledging difficulty—he argued that accepting this fundamental truth is paradoxically what makes life manageable. He wrote, ‘Once we truly know that life is difficult—once we truly understand and accept it—then life is no longer difficult. Because once it is accepted, the fact that life is difficult no longer matters’ (Peck, 1978, p. 15).

This acceptance that Peck describes is intimately connected to how we handle loss. When we resist the reality that attachments will change and end, we set ourselves up for perpetual anxiety—that feeling of ‘waiting for the other shoe to drop’ that so many of my clients describe. This chronic anticipatory grief often stems from our attempt to control the uncontrollable, to make permanent that which is by nature impermanent.

The Loss of Expectations

Perhaps no loss is more universally experienced yet less acknowledged than the loss of our expectations. We all carry mental models of how our lives ‘should’ unfold: career trajectories we imagine, relationship milestones we anticipate, family structures we envision. When reality diverges from these expectations—when the promotion doesn’t materialize, when the relationship ends, when the child struggles rather than thrives—we grieve the future we had constructed in our minds.

Viktor Frankl, a psychiatrist who survived the Nazi concentration camps, understood this dimension of loss with particular clarity. In

Man’s Search for Meaning, Frankl (1946/2006) described how prisoners who had fixed their hopes on a specific date for liberation often died shortly after that date passed if liberation hadn’t occurred. Their attachment to a particular expected outcome, when disappointed, proved psychologically and even physically devastating. Frankl’s insight was that survival—and by extension, meaningful living—required not attachment to specific outcomes but rather the ability to find meaning in whatever circumstances we face.

Frankl wrote, ‘When we are no longer able to change a situation, we are challenged to change ourselves’ (Frankl, 1946/2006, p. 112). This doesn’t minimize the grief we feel when expectations crumble. Rather, it suggests that part of healthy grieving involves releasing our attachment to how things ‘should’ be and developing a relationship with how things actually are. The parent who grieves their child’s learning disability must eventually release their attachment to the imagined ‘easier’ path and discover new sources of meaning in the reality they face. The professional whose industry becomes obsolete must grieve the career identity they cultivated while remaining open to unexpected sources of purpose.

The Loss of Relationships: People Coming and Going

While death represents the ultimate separation, many relationship losses occur without anyone dying. Friendships fade as life circumstances diverge. Colleagues who once felt like family become distant when we change jobs. Romantic relationships end not always with dramatic ruptures but sometimes with the quiet recognition that paths have diverged. Each of these losses activates our attachment system in ways remarkably similar to bereavement (Sbarra & Hazan, 2008).

Research on social neuroscience has revealed that social pain—the distress we feel when relationships end—activates the same brain regions as physical pain (Eisenberger, 2012). This isn’t metaphorical; the ache of a ended friendship or a dissolved partnership registers in our nervous system as genuine pain. Understanding this can validate the intensity of grief that follows relationship losses, even when well-meaning friends suggest we should simply ‘move on.’

Moreover, in our contemporary mobile society, we often form attachments knowing they may be temporary. The graduate student who bonds deeply with cohort members understands that graduation will scatter this community. The military family that integrates into a new base knows orders will eventually come, requiring another move. This awareness of impermanence can itself become a source of chronic low-level grief—that sense of impending loss that colors even joyful present moments.

The Loss of Place: Environments, Homes, and Communities

Our attachments extend beyond people to encompass the physical and social environments that ground our sense of identity. Environmental psychologists have documented how deeply we bond with places, particularly those associated with significant life experiences (Scannell & Gifford, 2010). The coffee shop where you wrote your dissertation, the park where your children learned to walk, the neighborhood where you felt most authentically yourself—these places become repositories of meaning and memory.

When we lose access to these places—through relocation, urban development, natural disasters, or economic circumstances—we experience what researchers term ‘solastalgia’: the distress caused by environmental change (Albrecht et al., 2007). This isn’t nostalgia for a distant past but rather grief for a lived environment that no longer exists or is no longer accessible. Climate change refugees, displaced by rising seas or increasing wildfires, don’t just lose homes; they lose entire landscapes of meaning, communities of connection, and ways of life passed down through generations.

Even changes that seem minor can trigger significant grief responses. The renovation of a childhood home, the closing of a beloved local business, the transformation of a familiar neighborhood through gentrification—each represents the loss of external anchors that helped us know who we are and where we belong. Peck (1978) would remind us that resisting these changes only amplifies our suffering. The work is to grieve what is lost while remaining open to new attachments, new places that might become meaningful.

The Loss of Routines, Interests, and Hobbies

We develop attachments to activities and routines that structure our days and express our identities. The runner who suffers a career-ending injury doesn’t just lose a form of exercise; they lose a daily ritual, a source of stress relief, a community of fellow runners, and perhaps a core aspect of how they understand themselves. The musician whose hearing deteriorates, the chef whose allergies prevent them from tasting their creations, the writer who develops arthritis—each faces the grief of losing not just an activity but a avenue for self-expression and meaning-making.

Life transitions often force us to abandon routines that once anchored us. New parenthood disrupts the spontaneity that previously characterized one’s social life. Career advancement may require sacrificing hobbies that once provided balance and joy. Aging bodies may no longer permit activities that once defined our leisure time. Each of these losses deserves acknowledgment and grief, not dismissal as ‘necessary sacrifices’ or ‘natural consequences of getting older.’

The Loss of Beliefs and Understandings

Perhaps the most disorienting losses involve our core beliefs and understandings about the world. When a trusted institution betrays that trust, when a faith tradition no longer resonates, when political or social beliefs shift, or when lived experience contradicts deeply held assumptions, we face what psychologists call cognitive dissonance—but what feels existentially like grief.

Frankl (1946/2006) observed that meaning provides the foundation for psychological resilience. When our meaning-making frameworks collapse, we experience profound disorientation. The person who leaves a controlling religious community grieves not just the loss of that specific faith but the certainty and structure it provided. The individual who recognizes that their family system was dysfunctional grieves the loss of the narrative they constructed about their childhood—even if the new understanding is ultimately liberating.

Research on worldview disruption shows that beliefs serve attachment functions remarkably similar to relationships (Park, 2010). They provide security, predictability, and a sense of belonging to something larger than ourselves. When these belief systems crumble or evolve, we undergo a mourning process that Peck (1978) would recognize as essential to psychological and spiritual growth. He wrote extensively about how genuine spiritual development requires repeatedly letting go of comfortable certainties—a continuous process of loss and renewal.

The Loss of Priorities: What Matters at Work, Home, and in Our Communities

Life circumstances often force dramatic shifts in what we can prioritize and value. The cancer diagnosis that transforms a workaholic into someone who measures success by time with family. The financial crisis that requires abandoning dreams of homeownership or higher education. The aging parent whose needs restructure adult children’s entire lives. These shifts in priorities aren’t merely logistical adjustments; they represent the loss of previously held values and the identities built around them.

In the workplace, organizational changes can dramatically shift what’s valued and rewarded. The employee who prided themselves on deep expertise may suddenly find the organization prizes generalists. The manager who built a career on mentoring relationships may face pressure to focus solely on metrics and efficiency. Communities, too, undergo transformations that alter collective priorities—gentrification changes what a neighborhood values, political shifts redefine what communities stand for, generational turnover transforms organizational cultures.

These losses are particularly difficult because they’re often invisible. The person struggling with them may feel isolated, believing they should simply adapt without grief. Yet Frankl’s (1946/2006) work reminds us that meaning isn’t found by suppressing our values but by consciously choosing how to respond when circumstances prevent us from living them out directly. The question becomes not ‘How do I stop grieving these losses?’ but ‘How can I find meaning within these new constraints?’

Living with Impending Loss: Addressing the ‘Other Shoe’ Phenomenon

Many people I work with describe a persistent sense of dread—a feeling that another loss is inevitable, that peace and stability are merely temporary preludes to the next crisis. This ‘waiting for the other shoe to drop’ phenomenon often develops after experiencing significant losses, particularly if those losses felt sudden, unfair, or overwhelming. The nervous system, having learned that security can vanish without warning, remains vigilant, constantly scanning for the next threat.

From a trauma-informed perspective, this hypervigilance makes perfect sense (van der Kolk, 2014). Our brains are designed to learn from experience, and when experience teaches us that loss can strike unpredictably, maintaining a high state of alertness or hyper-vigilence feels like rational self-protection. The problem, of course, is that this chronic activation takes an enormous toll, preventing us from fully inhabiting present moments and fostering the very anxiety we’re trying to avoid.

Understanding this pattern through Bowlby’s attachment lens reveals that these feelings often reflect an anxious attachment style—whether to people, places, or stability itself (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2007). Individuals with anxious attachment tend to experience relationships with a gnawing fear of abandonment, constantly seeking reassurance while simultaneously anticipating rejection or loss. When life experiences confirm these fears through actual losses, the pattern intensifies.

Yet here’s where Frankl’s insights become transformative. He observed that we cannot eliminate suffering from life, but we can choose how we relate to it. He wrote, ‘Between stimulus and response, there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom’ (Frankl, 1946/2006, p. 75). The space between anticipating loss and how we respond to that anticipation is where healing occurs.

Moving Through: Finding Hope, Purpose, and Meaning

If life inevitably involves loss, and if our attachments will continually form and dissolve, how do we move forward without becoming paralyzed by grief or defended against connection? The answer lies not in avoiding attachment or loss, but in fundamentally transforming our relationship with impermanence and developing what might be called ‘grief literacy’—the capacity to recognize, acknowledge, and integrate losses as they occur.

Acknowledge What Is Lost

The first step is simple but profound: name what you’re grieving. So often, we dismiss our feelings because the loss doesn’t fit conventional categories of grief. We tell ourselves we shouldn’t feel sad about an ended friendship (‘we just grew apart’), an abandoned career path (‘it was my choice’), or a changed community (‘progress is inevitable’). Yet Bowlby’s framework reminds us that grief follows disrupted attachment regardless of the reason for disruption or whether the loss involves death.

Practice giving language to your losses: ‘I’m grieving the version of my career I thought I would have.’ ‘I’m mourning the friendship that used to sustain me.’ ‘I’m sad about leaving this home, even though I’m excited about where I’m going.’ This naming doesn’t wallow in grief; it honors reality. Peck (1978) emphasized that genuine healing begins with radical honesty about what is, not what we wish were true.

Practice Radical Acceptance

Radical acceptance, a concept from Dialectical Behavior Therapy (Linehan, 1993), doesn’t mean liking or approving of what has happened. It means letting go of the exhausting struggle against reality. When we accept that loss is inevitable—not as a pessimistic resignation but as a grounded acknowledgment of how life works—we free energy currently consumed by resistance.

This aligns perfectly with Peck’s (1978) observation that ‘Once it is accepted, the fact that life is difficult no longer matters’ (p. 15). Acceptance doesn’t eliminate grief, but it does eliminate the secondary suffering that comes from believing grief shouldn’t exist or that its presence indicates personal failure. Notice the difference between ‘I’m grieving and I shouldn’t be’ versus ‘I’m grieving, and this is a natural response to loss.’ The second stance creates space for healing that the first forecloses.

Cultivate Meaning-Making

Frankl’s most enduring contribution was his insistence that we can find meaning even in suffering. He didn’t suggest that suffering itself is meaningful, but that our response to suffering can generate meaning. This distinction is crucial. Meaning-making doesn’t require that we be grateful for losses or find silver linings in tragedy. Instead, it involves actively constructing significance from our experiences.

Ask yourself: What can I learn from this loss? How might this experience deepen my empathy, strengthen my resilience, or clarify my values? What unexpected possibilities might emerge from this ending? The person who grieves a career loss might discover dormant interests. The individual mourning a dissolved relationship might develop a more authentic relationship with themselves. The community member who grieves neighborhood changes might become an agent of positive transformation rather than a passive witness to decline.

Research on post-traumatic growth demonstrates that people who actively engage in meaning-making following significant losses often report positive life changes, including deeper relationships, increased personal strength, greater appreciation for life, new possibilities, and spiritual development (Tedeschi & Calhoun, 2004). These don’t erase the loss or invalidate the grief, but they do testify to the human capacity to create meaning from painful experiences.

Develop Tolerance for Uncertainty

The ‘waiting for the other shoe to drop’ phenomenon often reflects intolerance of uncertainty—a desperate need to know what’s coming so we can brace for it. Yet as Peck (1978) noted, spiritual and psychological maturity involves embracing mystery and ambiguity. Life’s fundamental uncertainty isn’t a problem to solve but a condition to accept.

Practices that build uncertainty tolerance include mindfulness meditation, which trains us to remain present with uncomfortable feelings rather than immediately seeking resolution (Kabat-Zinn, 1994). Cognitive-behavioral approaches help us examine and challenge catastrophic thinking patterns that amplify anxiety about potential losses (Beck, 2011). The goal isn’t to become passive or indifferent to life’s challenges, but to develop what might be called ‘confident not-knowing’—the capacity to move forward meaningfully even without guarantees about outcomes.

Build Flexible Attachments

Bowlby’s work shows that attachment itself is healthy and necessary; the question is how we attach. Secure attachment involves a deep bond while maintaining individual resilience and identity (Ainsworth, 1989). Applied more broadly, this suggests we can form meaningful connections to people, places, beliefs, and roles while simultaneously holding them with enough flexibility that loss, while painful, doesn’t destroy us.

This doesn’t mean loving less or caring less. It means cultivating what Buddhists call ‘non-attachment’—engaging fully in life while releasing the illusion of permanent control (Nhat Hanh, 1987). The parent who can love their child intensely while also accepting that children grow and eventually separate demonstrates this flexible attachment. The professional who finds deep meaning in their work while recognizing that careers evolve and end exemplifies this balance.

Create Rituals of Transition

Grief rituals exist across cultures precisely because they serve psychological functions that facilitate mourning and transition (Romanoff & Terenzio, 1998). When we experience non-death losses—career changes, relocations, dissolved friendships, abandoned beliefs—we often lack formal rituals to mark these transitions. Creating personal or communal rituals can provide necessary closure and acknowledgment.

A ritual might be as simple as writing a letter to your former self or to what you’re releasing, then burning or burying it. It might involve gathering friends to formally acknowledge a significant life transition. It might mean creating art or music that expresses what cannot be spoken. The specific form matters less than the intentional marking of what has changed, the conscious acknowledgment of what is ending and what might be beginning.

Maintain Connections to Enduring Values

When external circumstances change dramatically—when we lose jobs, relationships, homes, communities, or cherished roles—we can feel completely unmoored. Frankl (1946/2006) suggested that meaning comes not from external circumstances but from living in alignment with our deepest values. These core values—compassion, integrity, creativity, justice, connection, growth—can remain constant even as the specific ways we express them shift dramatically.

The parent whose children leave home can continue valuing nurturance and care, perhaps redirecting it toward mentoring, community service, or caring for aging parents. The professional whose industry becomes obsolete can maintain commitment to excellence and contribution, finding new avenues for meaningful work. The individual who leaves a faith tradition can honor their spiritual values through different practices and communities. By distinguishing between values and the vehicles through which we express them, we maintain continuity of identity even through radical life changes.

Seek Support and Connection

Bowlby’s attachment theory underscores that we are fundamentally relational beings; we are not designed to face loss alone (Bowlby, 1969). Yet our culture often promotes a stoic individualism that equates needing support with weakness. Research consistently shows that social support is among the most potent predictors of resilience following loss (Stroebe et al., 2005). This includes both practical support and emotional validation.

Therapy can provide a dedicated space to process losses that might not be understood or validated elsewhere. Support groups connect us with others navigating similar transitions, reducing isolation and normalizing our experiences. Close relationships offer emotional holding during times of disorganization and despair. Even reading about others’ experiences with grief can create a sense of connection and validation.

If you’re experiencing chronic feelings of impending loss or anticipatory grief, reaching out for professional support isn’t an admission of failure—it’s a recognition that some burdens are too heavy to carry alone. As Peck (1978) noted, genuine growth often requires the assistance of others who can witness our struggle with compassion and without judgment.

Conclusion: Embracing the Fullness of Life

Life presents us with a paradox: to live fully, we must attach deeply to people, places, beliefs, and purposes, yet all attachment eventually involves loss. We cannot have one without the other. The attempt to protect ourselves from loss by refusing to attach leaves us safe but empty. The alternative—attaching while remaining continually braced for loss—leaves us anxious and unable to fully inhabit the present.

The wisdom offered by Bowlby, Peck, Frankl, and countless others who have studied human resilience suggests a third way: attach fully, grieve honestly when loss occurs, and trust in your capacity to find meaning and create new attachments even in the wake of profound loss. This isn’t naive optimism or denial of suffering’s reality. It’s a grounded recognition that we possess resources—psychological, relational, spiritual—that enable us to navigate loss without being destroyed by it.

If you find yourself perpetually waiting for the other shoe to drop, consumed by anxiety about inevitable losses, or feeling paralyzed by unacknowledged grief, please know that you don’t have to navigate these feelings alone. The very act of reading this article suggests you’re already engaged in the courageous work of understanding your experience more deeply. That’s where healing begins—not in the elimination of grief, but in developing a relationship with loss that allows for both sorrow and continued growth.

As you move forward, remember Frankl’s (1946/2006) profound insight: ‘Everything can be taken from a man but one thing: the last of the human freedoms—to choose one’s attitude in any given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way’ (p. 66). You cannot control what you will lose in life, but you can choose how you will grieve, how you will create meaning from your losses, and how you will continue to form new attachments even knowing they, too, will someday change or end.

This is not the road of least resistance. As Peck (1978) reminded us, it is the road less traveled—the path that requires discipline, courage, and commitment to psychological and spiritual growth. But it is also the path that leads to genuine freedom, authentic connection, and a life lived with open-hearted engagement rather than defended self-protection.

May you find the courage to grieve what must be grieved, the wisdom to accept what cannot be changed, and the resilience to continue attaching, loving, and finding meaning throughout all of life’s inevitable changes.

Ascend Counseling and Wellness – ascendcw.com – 435.688.1111 – kevin@ascendcw.com

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy.

American Psychologist, 44(4), 709–716. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.4.709

Albrecht, G., Sartore, G. M., Connor, L., Higginbotham, N., Freeman, S., Kelly, B., Stain, H., Tonna, A., & Pollard, G. (2007). Solastalgia: The distress caused by environmental change.

Australasian Psychiatry, 15(Suppl. 1), S95–S98. https://doi.org/10.1080/10398560701701288

Beck, J. S. (2011). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.

Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. Basic Books.

Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and depression. Basic Books.

Eisenberger, N. I. (2012). The pain of social disconnection: Examining the shared neural underpinnings of physical and social pain.

Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(6), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3231

Frankl, V. E. (2006). Man’s search for meaning. Beacon Press. (Original work published 1946)

Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. Hyperion.

Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.

Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.

Nhat Hanh, T. (1987). The miracle of mindfulness: An introduction to the practice of meditation. Beacon Press.

Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events.

Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301

Peck, M. S. (1978). The road less traveled: A new psychology of love, traditional values and spiritual growth. Simon & Schuster.

Romanoff, B. D., & Terenzio, M. (1998). Rituals and the grieving process.

Death Studies, 22(8), 697–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811898201227

Sbarra, D. A., & Hazan, C. (2008). Coregulation, dysregulation, self-regulation: An integrative analysis and empirical agenda for understanding adult attachment, separation, loss, and recovery.

Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(2), 141–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308315702

Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework.

Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006

Stroebe, M., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (2005). Attachment in coping with bereavement: A theoretical integration.

Review of General Psychology, 9(1), 48–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.9.1.48

Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence.

Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01

van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The body keeps the score: Brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Viking.

Navigating the Terrain of Grief: A Comprehensive Guide to Understanding Loss and Finding Hope

Kevin Brough, MAMFT

Introduction

Grief is one of the most universal yet intensely personal experiences we face as human beings. Whether you’re the person who has lost someone, a family member watching a loved one struggle, or a professional trying to provide support, grief touches all of us differently. Over my years working as a marriage and family therapist, I’ve sat with countless individuals navigating the crushing weight of loss—parents who’ve lost children, spouses mourning partners, and yes, fathers grappling with the unthinkable pain of losing a son.

What I’ve learned is this: grief doesn’t follow a script. It doesn’t adhere to timelines or neat stages. It’s messy, nonlinear, and at times, completely overwhelming. But I’ve also witnessed something remarkable—the human capacity for resilience, for finding meaning even in the darkest moments, and for eventually discovering a way to carry loss while still embracing loss while still embracing life.

This article explores grief from multiple perspectives—the griever, the family system, and the helping professional—while offering practical, evidence-based interventions and resources that can make a real difference when you’re struggling to find solid ground.

Understanding Grief: More Than Just Stages

For decades, we’ve been taught about Kübler-Ross’s five stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance (Kübler-Ross, 1969). While this model has value, it can also be limiting. Grief isn’t a straight line you walk from denial to acceptance. It’s more like being tossed around in ocean waves—sometimes you’re treading water, sometimes a wave knocks you under, and sometimes you find yourself floating in calm waters, only to be hit by another swell you didn’t see coming.

The Dual Process Model, developed by Stroebe and Schut (1999), captures this reality more accurately. This framework recognizes that people oscillate between two types of coping: loss-oriented activities (confronting the pain, yearning for the person, focusing on the loss itself) and restoration-oriented activities (adapting to new roles, building new routines, taking breaks from grieving). Both are necessary. Both are healthy.

Think about it this way: you can’t stare directly at the sun without looking away, and you can’t stare directly at your grief without taking breaks either. Those moments when you laugh at a memory, get absorbed in work, or enjoy a meal aren’t betrayals of your loved one—they’re necessary oscillations that allow you to integrate loss into your life rather than being consumed by it.

Worden’s (2010) Four Tasks of Mourning offers another helpful framework that emphasizes the active nature of grief work. These tasks include accepting the reality of the loss, processing the pain, adjusting to a world without the deceased, and finding an enduring connection while moving forward. Notice these are tasks, not stages—things we work toward, not boxes we check off.

The Griever’s Perspective: When You’re in the Eye of the Storm

If you’re reading this while actively grieving, I want you to know something: whatever you’re feeling right now is valid. The crushing sadness, the anger, the numbness, the moments when you forget they’re gone only to remember again—all of it is part of this journey. You have the right to grieve in your own way, on your own timeline, without pressure to feel or respond in ways that others expect.

Recognizing You’re Not Alone

While your experience of grief is uniquely yours—shaped by your relationship, your history, your personality—loss itself is part of the broader human experience. Every person who has ever loved has eventually faced loss. This doesn’t minimize your pain, but it does mean you’re not walking this path in isolation. Millions have walked it before you, millions walk it now, and connecting with that shared humanity can provide unexpected comfort (Neimeyer, 2015).

Understanding Your Unique Grief Pattern

Grief is multidimensional, affecting us physically, emotionally, cognitively, behaviorally, and spiritually. You might experience insomnia, loss of appetite, difficulty concentrating, changes in how you relate to others, or questions about meaning and purpose. Some people feel everything intensely; others feel numb. Some need to talk constantly; others need solitude. Understanding your particular pattern of grieving—without judgment—can help you work with your grief rather than against it (Worden, 2010).

Self-Interventions That Actually Help

1. Give yourself permission to oscillate. Based on the Dual Process Model, healthy grieving means moving between confronting your loss and taking breaks from it (Stroebe & Schut, 1999). There’s a fine line between avoidance and helpful distraction. Complete avoidance keeps you from processing what needs to be processed, but healthy temporary respite—watching a movie, going for a walk, spending time with a friend—gives your system the break it needs to continue facing the grief. Don’t shame yourself when you need to distract yourself or when waves of grief hit you unexpectedly. Both are necessary.

2. Journal your way through. Research consistently shows that expressive writing helps process grief (Neimeyer, 2015). Consider committing to 40 days of grief journaling—even just five minutes a day. Write about your loved one, your memories, your anger, your confusion, your gratitude. Write letters to them expressing what you never got to say. Use metaphors that capture what grief feels like for you—is it like drowning? Like carrying a heavy backpack? Like living in fog? These images can help you access and process feelings that don’t easily translate into straightforward language.

3. Create tangible connections. Worden (2010) emphasizes finding ways to maintain bonds with the deceased while building a new life. This might mean keeping photos visible, wearing their clothing or jewelry, creating a memorial space, or carrying a meaningful object. Consider creating a “Life Certificate”—a document that honors your loved one’s life, captures what made them special, and solidifies your enduring emotional connection with them. These aren’t signs you’re “stuck”—they’re healthy ways to honor the relationship while moving forward.

4. Establish meaningful rituals. Rituals help us manage extreme emotions and regain a sense of control when loss has shattered our world (Neimeyer, 2015). This might be visiting their grave on certain days, lighting a candle on their birthday, cooking their favorite meal on holidays, or creating new traditions that celebrate their life. Rituals don’t have to be elaborate—even small, consistent acts of remembrance can provide structure and meaning.

5. Use evocative language. It might sound harsh, but saying “my son died” rather than “I lost my son” actually helps your brain process the reality of what happened (Worden, 2010). The euphemisms we use, while gentler in the moment, can sometimes keep us from fully accepting what we need to eventually comprehend.

6. Practice self-compassion meditation. Research shows that meditation can reduce insomnia, improve concentration, and help manage the complex emotions associated with grief (Black & Slavich, 2016). Even five minutes of compassionate breathing can create space between you and overwhelming feelings. Apps like Insight Timer and Calm offer free guided meditations specifically for grief.

7. Map your support system. Create a visual representation of the people and resources available to you. Who can you call at 3 a.m.? Who brings you meals? Who just sits with you without trying to fix anything? Understanding your support network helps you know who to reach out to and for what (Neimeyer, 2015). And if your network feels sparse, that’s information too—it might be time to seek additional support through grief groups or counseling.

8. Connect with what’s bigger than grief. While grief can feel all-consuming, you are more than your grief. Connecting with your strengths, values, and the parts of your identity that remain intact can prevent complete immersion in loss (Neimeyer, 2015). This isn’t about denying grief—it’s about maintaining the perspective that you’re a whole person navigating a devastating experience, not just a grieving person.

9. Take care of your grieving self. Grief is exhausting work. Assess your current self-care honestly: Are you eating? Sleeping? Moving your body? Connecting with others? Grief often depletes us in multiple dimensions simultaneously. Brainstorm specific, achievable ways to care for yourself—perhaps it’s asking someone to bring groceries, taking a 10-minute walk, or simply giving yourself permission to rest (Worden, 2010).

10. Share your loss with others—when you’re ready. Talking about your grief, listening to others’ stories, and reflecting on these experiences can facilitate healing. But there’s no timeline for when you should be ready to share. Some people need to talk immediately; others need time to process privately first. Honor your own rhythm while remaining open to connection when it feels right (Neimeyer, 2015).

11. Use imagery to reconnect. When you’re ready, guided imagery can help you intentionally connect with the inner presence of your loved one. Close your eyes and imagine meeting them face-to-face. Tell them what you miss. Ask them what you need to know. Say goodbye for now. This isn’t about denial—it’s about accessing the ongoing bond you maintain with them even in their physical absence (Neimeyer, 2015).

12. Restore your broken mirror. Grief shatters us. Use the metaphor of a broken mirror to identify activities that will help you reassemble the pieces of yourself. You won’t be the same—cracks and gaps will remain, and the reflection will look different—but you can create something whole again, perhaps even more beautiful for having been broken and restored (Neimeyer, 2015).

Critical Resources for When Grief Becomes Overwhelming

If you’re experiencing suicidal thoughts:

• 988 Suicide and Crisis Lifeline: Call or text 988 (available 24/7)
• Crisis Text Line: Text HOME to 741741
• The Trevor Project (for LGBTQ+ youth): 1-866-488-7386

These aren’t signs of weakness. Grief can trigger profound despair, especially in the early weeks and months. One study found that approximately 10% of bereaved individuals experience intense, prolonged suffering that can last years (Currier et al., 2008). You’re not alone in feeling this way, and reaching out for help is one of the bravest things you can do.

For ongoing support:

• GriefShare: Faith-based support groups meeting nationwide (griefshare.org)
• The Compassionate Friends: Specifically for parents who have lost children (compassionatefriends.org)
• GRASP (Grief Recovery After a Substance Passing): For those who’ve lost someone to addiction or overdose (grasphelp.org)
• Open to Hope: Online community and resources (opentohope.com)
• What’s Your Grief: Practical, accessible grief education and community (whatsyourgrief.com)

Finding a therapist:

• Psychology Today therapist directory (psychologytoday.com/us/therapists)
• Your insurance provider’s directory
• Look specifically for therapists trained in grief counseling or complicated grief treatment
• If you reside in Utah, call Ascend Counseling & Wellness at 435-688-1111

The Family System Perspective: When Someone You Love Is Grieving

Watching someone you care about drown in grief is its own kind of helplessness. You want to fix it, to take away their pain, but you can’t. What you can do is show up, bear witness, and offer consistent, compassionate presence.

How to Support Someone in Grief

Don’t avoid them. People often pull away from those who are grieving because they don’t know what to say. The truth is, there’s nothing you can say that will make it better, and that’s okay. What matters is showing up. Send a text that says, “thinking of you today.” Drop off food. Offer to sit together in silence. Your presence matters more than your words.

Use direct language. Following Worden’s (2010) guidance, don’t be afraid to say “died” instead of “passed away” or “lost.” While it might feel uncomfortable, direct language actually helps the griever process reality.

Remember the long game. Everyone shows up in the first few weeks. Be the person who checks in at three months, six months, and a year. Grief doesn’t follow our social timelines, and the loneliest time is often when everyone else assumes you should be “over it.”

Offer specific help. “Let me know if you need anything” puts the burden on the griever. Instead, try: “I’m going to the store—what can I pick up for you?” or “I’m free Tuesday afternoon to help with yard work.”

Validate without fixing. When someone shares their pain, resist the urge to minimize it with platitudes like “they’re in a better place” or “everything happens for a reason.” Instead, try: “This is so hard. I’m here” or “I can’t imagine what you’re going through, but I’m here to listen.”

Give them permission to grieve in their own way. Don’t impose expectations about how they should feel or when they should “move on.” Each person’s grief is shaped by their unique relationship, personality, and circumstances. Your role is to support their process, not dictate it (Neimeyer, 2015).

When to Encourage Professional Help

According to research, early high levels of distress are among the best predictors of later difficulties, suggesting the person is at risk for complicated grief (Worden, 2010). Watch for:

• Suicidal ideation or self-harm
• Inability to function in daily life (not eating, not sleeping, unable to work) lasting beyond the first few weeks
• Substance abuse as a coping mechanism
• Complete withdrawal from relationships and activities
• No oscillation—stuck entirely in either restoration or loss orientation
• Grief that intensifies rather than gradually softens over time

Complicated grief affects about 10% of bereaved individuals and can include prolonged, intense symptoms that interfere with the ability to re-engage with life (Currier et al., 2008). This isn’t weakness—it’s a sign that specialized grief therapy might be beneficial.

The Professional Perspective: Providing Competent Grief Support

As clinicians, we occupy a unique position in the grief process. We provide a safe container for emotions that might feel too overwhelming to share with family or friends. We normalize experiences that clients fear mean they’re “going crazy.” We offer evidence-based interventions while honoring the deeply individual nature of each person’s loss.

Effective Clinical Interventions

Assessment matters. Before jumping into interventions, assess where the client is in their grief process. Tools like the Hogan Grief Reaction Checklist (Hogan & Schmidt, 2016) can help evaluate current distress levels and indicators of complicated grief versus normal bereavement responses. Additionally, help clients analyze their own way of grieving by exploring how loss affects them physically, emotionally, cognitively, behaviorally, and spiritually. This multidimensional assessment normalizes the varied manifestations of grief.

Distinguish between counseling and therapy. Grief counseling facilitates normal grief reactions, helping clients move through Worden’s tasks of mourning within a reasonable timeframe (Worden, 2010). Grief therapy addresses complicated grief reactions—prolonged, delayed, exaggerated, or otherwise pathological responses that impair functioning. Knowing this distinction helps determine the appropriate level of care.

Timing is everything. While exceptions exist, grief counseling typically begins about a week after the funeral (Worden, 2010). The first 24 hours post-loss involve shock, logistics, and survival mode. Clients need time to surface before they can dive into the work of mourning. However, if a client reaches out in crisis earlier, meet them where they are.

Guide clients through the Four Tasks of Mourning. Use Worden’s (2010) framework systematically. Help them identify which task they’re currently working on and what concrete steps might move them forward. Task 1 involves accepting the reality—encourage them to talk about the loss using direct language. Task 2 means experiencing the pain—create space for full emotional expression. Task 3 requires adjusting to life without the deceased—problem-solve around new roles and responsibilities. Task 4 involves finding ways to memorialize while reinvesting in life—explore what they want for themselves now.

Facilitate structured journaling. Consider proposing a 40-day grief journaling commitment. This provides structure while allowing flexibility in what clients explore. Prompts might include: “What I miss most today,” “A memory I want to preserve,” “What I wish I had said,” or “How I’m taking care of myself.” The commitment itself becomes a ritual, and the accumulated entries create a tangible record of the journey (Neimeyer, 2015).

Help clients create a Life Certificate. This decisive intervention involves creating a document that honors the deceased person’s life—their values, impact, defining characteristics, and the legacy they leave behind. This process helps clients renegotiate their relationship with the deceased, moving from “they are gone” to “they lived, they mattered, and they remain part of my story” (Neimeyer, 2015).

Map the support system. Work with clients to create a visual representation—perhaps circles of support showing who provides what kind of help. This clarifies available resources and identifies gaps that might need to be filled through support groups, additional services, or expanded social connections (Neimeyer, 2015).

Normalize the right to grieve in their own way. Many clients feel pressure from family, culture, or internalized expectations about how they “should” grieve. Psychoeducation about the individual nature of grief and explicit permission to honor their own process can be profoundly relieving (Neimeyer, 2015).

Contextualize suffering within the human experience. While each person’s loss is unique, grief itself is universal. Help clients recognize that their suffering, while intensely personal, connects them to the broader human experience of love and loss. This can reduce feelings of isolation and abnormality (Neimeyer, 2015).

Use metaphor therapeutically. Ask clients: “If your grief were a landscape, what would it look like?” or “If you could describe this experience in one image, what would it be?” Metaphors access emotional truth that direct language sometimes can’t reach. The broken mirror metaphor, mentioned earlier, can help clients visualize both the shattering impact of loss and the possibility of reconstruction (Neimeyer, 2015).

Teach the distinction between avoidance and helpful distraction. Using the Dual Process Model, help clients understand that taking breaks from grief isn’t betrayal or denial—it’s necessary restoration. Work together to identify genuinely restorative activities (time with friends, hobbies, nature) versus numbing behaviors (excessive alcohol, compulsive work, complete isolation). The goal is intentional oscillation, not permanent escape (Stroebe & Schut, 1999).

Connect clients with what’s bigger than grief. Even in the midst of devastating loss, clients retain strengths, values, and aspects of identity. Help them reconnect with these anchors. What matters to them beyond this loss? What gives them meaning? This isn’t minimizing grief—it’s preventing complete identity fusion with the grieving process (Neimeyer, 2015).

Facilitate ritual creation. Work with clients to design meaningful rituals—visiting a special place on anniversaries, annual charitable donations in the deceased’s name, lighting candles, planting memorial gardens. Rituals provide structure, meaning, and active ways to maintain connection while honoring loss (Neimeyer, 2015).

Encourage sharing stories. Create opportunities for clients to tell stories about their loved one, to say their name out loud, and to share memories. For many grievers, others’ discomfort means the deceased becomes unspeakable. Your office should be a place where the person remains vividly alive in conversation (Neimeyer, 2015).

Assess and enhance self-care. Systematically review how clients are caring for themselves physically, emotionally, socially, and spiritually. Grief depletes resources across all domains. Brainstorm specific, achievable self-care strategies and problem-solve around barriers. Sometimes permission to rest or to prioritize basic needs is itself therapeutic (Worden, 2010).

Use imagery work. Guided imagery exercises that help clients “meet” the deceased, say what was left unsaid, or revisit meaningful memories can facilitate both connection and closure (Neimeyer, 2015). This technique taps into our brain’s powerful visual processing capabilities and can be particularly helpful for working through unfinished business.

Incorporate body-based practices. The research on meditation and yoga for grief is compelling, showing reduced insomnia, improved concentration, and better emotional regulation (Black & Slavich, 2016; Desbordes et al., 2012). Teach clients simple breathwork or recommend gentle yoga classes designed for those in grief.

Facilitate letter writing. Writing to the deceased allows clients to express unsaid thoughts, articulate regrets, seek forgiveness, or simply say goodbye. These letters can be read aloud in session, kept private, or even symbolically delivered through burning or burial. The act of writing creates both expression and resolution (Neimeyer, 2015; Worden, 2010).

Employ role-play carefully. Empty chair work and other role-play techniques can be powerful for expressing unsaid words or working through complicated emotions toward the deceased (Worden, 2010). However, ensure the client is ready for this level of emotional engagement.

Educate about the Dual Process Model. Normalize the oscillation between grief and restoration activities (Stroebe & Schut, 1999). Clients often feel guilty when they have “good” moments or need breaks from grieving. Psychoeducation about this model can be profoundly relieving.

Managing Countertransference and Self-Care

Working with grief can activate our own losses and fears. Regular supervision, personal therapy, and honest self-reflection about our triggers are essential. Notice when you want to rush a client through their pain or when you’re avoiding specific topics. These reactions contain crucial information about our own work.

Conclusion: Holding Space for Hope

Grief transforms us. It marks a clear before and after in our lives. But here’s what I’ve witnessed again and again in my work: people don’t “get over” profound loss, but they do learn to integrate it. They find ways to carry their loved one forward while building meaningful lives. They discover that honoring the past and embracing the future aren’t mutually exclusive.

If you’re in the depths of grief right now, please know that what you’re feeling—however intense, however strange—is part of the human experience of love and loss. You have the right to grieve in your own way. Reach out. Use the resources. Give yourself permission to both grieve and to take breaks from grieving. Be patient with yourself. Healing isn’t linear, and it doesn’t mean forgetting.

If you’re supporting someone in grief, your consistent, compassionate presence is more powerful than you know. Keep showing up. Keep saying their loved one’s name. Keep holding space for the reality that grief is love’s other face. And remember—you can’t fix their pain, but you can walk alongside them through it.

And if you’re a professional working with bereaved clients, thank you for holding space for one of life’s most difficult passages. Your work matters profoundly. Continue refining your skills, seeking supervision, and taking care of yourself so you can continue offering this sacred service.

Grief is the price we pay for love, and while that price can feel unbearably high, it’s also a testament to the depth of our connections. In honoring our losses, we ultimately honor what—and who—matters most.

Ascend Counseling and Wellness – ascendcw.com – 435.688.1111 – kevin@ascendcw.com

References

American Cancer Society. (2019). Hospice care. https://www.cancer.org/treatment/end-of-life-care/hospice-care.html

American Psychological Association. (2022). Grief. In APA dictionary of psychology. https://dictionary.apa.org/grief

Black, D. S., & Slavich, G. M. (2016). Mindfulness meditation and the immune system: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1373(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12998

Brown, E. J. (2021). Complicated grief. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/topics/grief/complicated

Currier, J. M., Neimeyer, R. A., & Berman, J. S. (2008). The effectiveness of psychotherapeutic interventions for bereaved persons: A comprehensive quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 134(5), 648–661. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.648

Davies, B. (2013). Supporting families in palliative care. In B. R. Ferrell & N. Coyle (Eds.), Oxford textbook of palliative nursing (4th ed., pp. 613–627). Oxford University Press.

Desbordes, G., Negi, L. T., Pace, T. W., Wallace, B. A., Raison, C. L., & Schwartz, E. L. (2012). Effects of mindful-attention and compassion meditation training on amygdala response to emotional stimuli in an ordinary, non-meditative state. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00292

Hogan, N. S., & Schmidt, L. A. (2016). An overview of the Hogan Grief Reaction Checklist: Applications for researchers and clinicians. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 73(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222815598099

Kübler-Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying. Macmillan.

Myers, A. E., & Donley, A. M. (2022). COVID-19 and online memorial culture. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 85(1), 231–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/00302228211039784

Neimeyer, R. A. (Ed.). (2015). Techniques of grief therapy: Assessment and intervention. Routledge.

Robinson, S., & Pond, R. (2019). “Do I deserve to feel better?” Deservingness as a barrier to accessing online support for complicated grief. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 79(4), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222817715983

Rogalla, K. B. (2020). Anticipatory grief, proactive coping, social support, and growth: Exploring positive experiences of preparing for loss. OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying, 82(1), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0030222818761461

Stroebe, M., & Schut, H. (1999). The dual process model of coping with bereavement: Rationale and description. Death Studies, 23(3), 197–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/074811899201046

Worden, J. W. (2010). Grief counseling and grief therapy: A handbook for the mental health practitioner (4th ed.). Springer.